Venepuncture/Phlebotomy Online Training

Categories: Online Courses
Wishlist Share
Share Course
Page Link
Share On Social Media

About Course

Venepuncture is an important skill for anyone who works, or would like to work, in the health or social care sectors, or in the field of scientific research and study.

The difference between venipuncture and phlebotomy is their purpose.

Venipuncture is the process of puncturing a vein with a needle for any medical purpose.

Phlebotomy is venipuncture performed specifically to obtain blood samples for study.

Aim and intended learning outcomes

The aim of this Course is to provide guidance on the theory and practice of venepuncture.  After this course, you should be able to:

  • Understand and describe the anatomy and physiology relating to venepuncture.

  • Identify issues of accountability, consent and anxiety, safety, infection control and competence in relation to this procedure.

  • Review your clinical skill in venepuncture and benchmark against best practice.

  • Ensure that you are aware of the possible complications of venepuncture and how to manage them.

Show More

Course Content

Learning Outcomes
▶Understand and describe the anatomy and physiology relating to venepuncture. ▶Identify issues of accountability, consent and anxiety, safety, infection control and competence in relation to this procedure. ▶Review your clinical skill in venepuncture and benchmark against best practice. ▶Ensure that you are aware of the possible complications of venepuncture and how to manage them.

Introduction to the Course
Introduction Venepuncture describes the introduction of a needle into a vein to obtain a representative sample of the circulating blood for haematological, biochemical or bacteriological analysis. It is a common clinical skill but unlike many other clinical skills it can involve a variety of personnel including phlebotomists and clinical support workers, as well as registered nurses, midwives and medical staff. This Course focuses on the role of the registered nurse, and thus the term ‘nurse’ will be used. The theory and practice can, however, be applied universally.

Anatomy and physiology

Professional Standards

Patient Anxiety
In an effort to reduce patient anxiety and as good practice, patients should be asked if they have had venepuncture performed previously. Particular attention should be paid to any adverse outcomes or experiences so that reassurance can be given or further action taken. Information on the need for blood tests should be fully detailed, and explain how to obtain the results and the expected time scale. This is helpful to patients and may also reduce anxiety, especially for patients undergoing investigation, and thus ensure a positive experience. It also gives the nurse the opportunity to check the correct blood test has been requested and that patients have prepared themselves physically if necessary, for example, checking that they have not eaten or drunk for a set time period before fasting blood sugar and cholesterol. Anxiety about the procedure can be caused by a previous bad experience, a degree of ‘needle phobia’ or a dislike of medical procedures. Distraction is a useful technique for the mildly anxious, for example, the cough technique, which involves asking the patient to cough simultaneously when venepuncture is performed. Despite the mechanism remaining unclear, Usichenko et al (2004) found that the cough technique was a low-cost and effective way to reduce pain in venepuncture. Distraction has also been explored when performing venepuncture and cannulation in children of all ages. Willock et al (2004) suggest it is an effective coping strategy particularly in older children. The use of relaxation techniques has also been identified as useful and can be easily taught to adults. Another common method to reduce venepuncture pain is the use of topical creams, which act as local anaesthetics. Despite having cost implications they are widely used in children and could also be used for anxious adults. Neal (1997) explains that anaesthetic agents penetrate nerve fibres and block sodium channels, preventing the generation of action potentials. It is recommended that the prescribed cream is applied to more than one site should venepuncture be unsuccessful at the first site and once applied covered by an occlusive dressing, which should be wiped off before the procedure. Emla® is a common choice although the recommended time to leave it in situ varies, with some studies stating that it only becomes fully effective after 90 minutes (Selby and Bowles 1995, Patterson et al 2000). However, when using either Emla® or Ametop® cream the user should review the common complications; paleness, redness and oedema have been reported using Emla®, and hypersensitivity has been reported with Ametop® (British National Formulary 2004). Repeated exposure to Ametop® has been shown to cause possible red raised areas and blistering, and the area should be observed every ten minutes (Willock et al 2004). Ametop® should not be left on the skin for more than 60 minutes but will last four to six hours after application. Despite these side effects, Emla® has been shown to reduce the pain of venepuncture in adults (Hallen et al 1985) and, provided the instructions are followed, offers a solution for anxious adults. Subdermal lidocaine reduces pain when compared with not using an anaesthetic agent (Dickey 1988), however, when compared with Emla® cream it is not as effective (Lander et al 1996). The use of therapeutic touch, a natural healing modality using gentle physical touch, has been shown to reduce patients’ anxiety, relax them and provide a distraction during venepuncture (Wendler 2002). Therapeutic touch has the advantage of being free once a practitioner has been taught the technique, which involves attendance at a certified course. However, care should be taken to ensure that patients want this intervention as some individuals in Wendler’s (2002) study had a negative experience resulting in further anxiety because the time taken to administer therapeutic touch delayed the venepuncture procedure. The use of touch by a stranger also caused anxiety in some patients. Thus, Wendler (2002) recommends further research before widespread use of the technique is adopted. Anxiety regarding venepuncture should form part of the nurse’s assessment of the patient. Where possible, the causes of patient anxiety should be explored and actions planned to help alleviate this.

Safety
When performing venepuncture, the safety of the patient and nurse should be considered. Patient safety should be considered in relation to the patient’s position when the procedure is being performed. If the patient has a history of fainting during venepuncture, then he or she should lie down to reduce the possibility of a fall, which could have serious consequences (Black and Hughes 1997). It is essential that the person taking blood is competent in this procedure as this will also help to reduce the risk of avoidable complications. Allergies should be considered, and, if the patient is allergic to latex, plasters or the apparatus, then alternatives should be sought. All equipment should be sterile and where possible single use only (Medical Devices Agency (MDA) 1996). The blood should be collected in accordance with local policies and procedures. Consider the order in which blood tubes are used as this can affect the results, for example, the blood tube ethylenediaminetetra-acetic acid (EDTA) contains potassium and so should be sampled last (NHS LUHD 2004). Whether addressograph labels can be used should also be clarified, and all personal details should be checked with the patient to ensure validity. The possibility of a sharps injury is a potential safety risk to patients and staff, and safe and prompt disposal of sharps is essential.

Preperation

Summary
Venepuncture is an essential procedure to aid the monitoring and diagnosis of a patient’s condition. It is the most common invasive procedure in hospitals (Castledine 1996), and can be carried out by a range of suitably prepared healthcare professionals. Inwood (1996) notes that nurses could improve the total care of patients by performing venepuncture, rather than fragmenting or delaying care by other practitioners undertaking this skill. Good practice requires skill, knowledge and competent performance, and all practitioners involved should maintain regular practice and at least annual review of their practice. Registered practitioners are bound by their code of professional conduct and are accountable for their actions (GMC 2001, NMC 2004). Current debate on the regulation of support workers may address their role, however, they and phlebotomists are not regulated and so the responsibility to ensure appropriate training, supervision and assessment rests with the employer. Current pre-registration nurse training does not cover venepuncture within the curriculum, and so it is taught post-registration and has led to variable standards in content and practice. NES (2004) has set up a project to explore the situation in Scotland and has encouraged higher education institutions and NHS Scotland to collaborate and explore a standardised programme. This will promote safe and consistent practice in the future and enable staff to transfer clinical skills such as venepuncture, IV therapy and cannulation to new employers with the assurance that they meet national requirements.

References
References Black F, Hughes J (1997) Venepuncture. Nursing Standard. 11, 41, 49-53. [Google Scholar] Boeson MB, Hranchook A, Stoller J (2000) Peripheral nerve injury from intravenous cannulation: a case report. AANA Journal. 68, 1, 53-57. [PUBMED] [Google Scholar] British National Formulary (2004) British National Formulary No 48. British Medical Association and Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, London.http://www.biblio.com/books/159625850.html [Google Scholar] Castledine G (1996) Nurses’ role in peripheral venous cannulation. British Journal of Nursing. 5, 20, 1274. [PUBMED] [Google Scholar] Conroy F (2004) Preventing the spread of MRSA: …and the role of practices such as phlebotomy is worth considering. British Medical Journal. 329, 7472, 978. [PUBMED] [CROSSREF] [Google Scholar] Davies JM, Aston DLA (2002) Inappropriate blood transfusions caused by poor phlebotomy techniques. Transfusion Medicine. 12, Suppl 1, 38. [CROSSREF] [Google Scholar] Dickey J (1988) Effectiveness of intradermally injected lidocaine hydrochloride as a local anesthetic for intravenous catheter insertion. Journal of Emergency Nursing. 14, 3, 160-163. [PUBMED] [Google Scholar] Dimond B (1995) Legal Aspects of Nursing. Second edition. Prentice Hall, London. [Google Scholar] Ernst DJ (2001) The right way to do blood cultures. RN. 64, 3, 28-31. [PUBMED] [Google Scholar] Franklin L (1999) Skin cleansing and infection control in peripheral venepuncture and cannulation. Nursing Standard. 14, 4, 49-50. [PUBMED] [Google Scholar] General Medical Council (2001) Good Medical Practice. GMC, London.http://www.gmc-uk.org/gmp_2001.pdf_25416526.pdf [Google Scholar] Hallen B, Carlsson P, Uppfeldt A (1985) Clinical study of a lidocaineprilocaine cream to relieve the pain of venepuncture. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 57, 3, 326-328. [PUBMED] [CROSSREF] [Google Scholar] Hartley J (2005) Clinicians told to dispose of own sharps. Nursing Times. 101, 5, 3. [Google Scholar] Health Protection Agency (2005) Eye of the Needle. HPA, London.http://www.hpa.org.uk/webc/HPAwebFile/HPAweb_C/1194947321671 [Google Scholar] Hefler L, Grimm C, Leodolter S, Tempfer C (2004) To butterfly or to needle: the pilot phase. Annals of Internal Medicine. 140, 11, 935-936. [PUBMED] [Google Scholar] Ingram P, Lavery I (2005) Peripheral intravenous therapy: key risks and implications for practice. Nursing Standard. 19, 46, 55-64. [PUBMED] [Google Scholar] Inwood S (1996) Designing a nurse training programme for venepuncture. Nursing Standard. 10, 21, 40-42. [PUBMED] [Google Scholar] Lander J, Nazarali S, Hodgins M et al (1996) Evaluation of a new topical anesthetic agent: a pilot study. Nursing Research. 45, 1, 50-53. [PUBMED] [CROSSREF] [Google Scholar] Lavery I (2003) Peripheral intravenous cannulation and patient consent. Nursing Standard. 17, 28, 40-42. [PUBMED] [Google Scholar] Medical Devices Agency (1996) Sterilisation, Disinfection and Cleaning of Medical Equipment: Guidance on Decontamination from the Microbiology Advisory Committee to Department of Health. MDA, London. [Google Scholar] NHS Education for Scotland (2004) Transferring the Skills: A Quality Assurance Framework for Venepuncture, Cannulation and Intravenous Therapy. www.nes.scot.nhs.uk/docs/publications/ClinicalSkillsdraft121004.doc (Last accessed: July 29 2005.) [Google Scholar] NHS Lothian – University Hospitals Division (2004) Venepuncture and/or Peripheral IV Cannulation: Clinical Skills Education Package. LUHD, Edinburgh. [Google Scholar] Neal M (1997) Medical Pharmacology at a Glance. Third edition. Blackwell Science, Oxford.http://www.amazon.co.uk/Medical-Pharmacology-Glance-Michael-Neal/dp/0632048166 [Google Scholar] Nursing and Midwifery Council (2004) The NMC Code of Professional Conduct; Standards for Conduct, Performance and Ethics. NMC, London.http://www.elderabuse.org.uk/Documents/NMC%20code%20of%20conduct.pdf [Google Scholar] Patterson P, Hussa AA, Fedele KA, Vegh GL, Hackman CM (2000) Comparison of four analgesic agents for venepuncture. AANA Journal. 68, 1, 43-51. [PUBMED] [Google Scholar] Rowe JA (2000) Accountability: a fundamental component of nursing practice. British Journal of Nursing. 9, 9, 549-552. [PUBMED] [Google Scholar] Royal College of Nursing (2003) Standards for Infusion Therapy. RCN, London.http://docsfiles.com/pdf_standards_for_infusion_therapy.html [Google Scholar] Selby IR, Bowles BJ (1995) Analgesia for venous cannulation: a comparison of EMLA (5 minutes application), lignocaine, ethyl chloride, and nothing. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 88, 5, 264-267. [PUBMED] [Google Scholar] Swannell J (Ed) (2003) The Little Oxford Dictionary. Sixth edition. Clarendon Press, Oxford. [Google Scholar] Tortora GJ, Grabowski SR (2003) Principles of Anatomy and Physiology. Tenth edition. Wiley, New York NY.http://www.amazon.com/Principles-Anatomy-Physiology-10th-Edition/dp/0471415014#reader_0471415014 [Google Scholar] Usichenko TI, Pavlovic D, Foellner S, Wendt M (2004) Reducing venepuncture pain by a cough trick: a randomized crossover volunteer study. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 98, 2, 343-345. [PUBMED] [CROSSREF] [Google Scholar] Watterson L (2004) Monitoring sharps injuries: EPINet surveillance results. Nursing Standard. 19, 3, 33-38. [PUBMED] [Google Scholar] Wendler MC (2002) Tellington touch before venepuncture: an exploratory descriptive study. Holistic Nursing Practice. 16, 4, 51-64. [PUBMED] [Google Scholar] Willock J, Richardson J, Brazier A, Powell C, Mitchell E (2004) Peripheral venepuncture in infants and children. Nursing Standard. 18, 27, 43-50. [PUBMED] [Google Scholar] Witt B (2004) Venepuncture. In Dougherty L, Lister S (Eds) The Royal Marsden Hospital Manual of Clinical Nursing Procedures. Sixth edition. Blackwell, Oxford, 774-785.http://www.amazon.co.uk/Marsden-Hospital-Clinical-Nursing-Procedures/dp/140510161X [Google Scholar]